The focus of this web site is medicine. In this blog, you’ll read about patient stories. The situations have been changed to be HIPAA compliant. Factual statements may or may not be true. I may change ages, gender or presenting complaints about patients. I may even entirely make up complete patient encounters from my fertile imagination. Trust me, if you think I’m writing about you, I’m not. There are billions of people in this world and readers send me stories about patients all the time. It isn’t you.
You’ll also read a lot about health care policy. I may throw in posts about life lessons, computers, and will even throw in family stories once in a while. If you’re looking for articles about politics, sports, or celebrities, you’re in the wrong place – unless the topics have some relationship to medicine.
If you want to add a guest post or to cross-post something from your blog, or if you have a patient story you want me to write about, e-mail me. See more information in the “About Me” page.
I haven’t really integrated feed readers into my daily routine for several reasons. I like going to my favorite sites and blogs and not only reading the content, but also reading the comments to the content. In the online world, there is a saying that “content is king.” Content is king for several reasons. 1. Content draws readers. When readers like content and forward the content to their friends, good content draws even more readers. 2. With more readers, content brings more advertising dollars. Advertisers like eyeballs. Advertisers are more interested in sites that have larger readership simply because the higher traffic allows the advertisers to introduce their product to more people. 3. Probably most important to bloggers is that content brings together a community of people with similar interests to engage in discussions. Bloggers create content to engage their readers and the engagement is reflected not only in site visits, but also in the comments to posts. Good or bad, we like reading what you think about what we say. RSS and newsfeed readers are therefore good and bad. RSS and newsfeed readers are helpful to the people reading the content because they organize all of the content in one central location. When time is at a premium, it is a lot easier to skim a feed in the morning than it is to read through a couple of dozen web sites. On the other hand, feed readers can be harmful to a blogger’s morale. If everyone reads posts through feeds, then traffic to web sites drops off. When traffic suffers, there’s less feedback to the bloggers, and when there’s less feedback, there is less motivation to sit down and try to create content during your free time. I get the whole feedback/convenience concept which is why I throw affiliate links into my posts. If people want to support the blog and don’t want to visit, the opportunity is there. If not, I can just imagine the tens or hundreds of thousands of anonymous readers subscribed to my posts and how much I am changing the opinions of medical professionals all over the world. Hey – a guy can dream, right? When Google closed down its reader, there were a lot of questions about which feed reader to use as a replacement. Feedly.com kind of surfaced as the leader. As Feedly became more popular, it began to implement changes that were not so user friendly. Last month, Feedly tried to require all of its users to have Google+ accounts. An expression of outrage by its current users got Feedly to remove the requirement. Now Feedly has apparently attempted to lay claim to the content created by independent bloggers. I read a story on a site called the Digital Reader about how Feedly had secretly changed the way in which it links to content in its reader. Usually, if a reader sees something he or she likes in a post on an RSS reader or a newsfeed, the reader can click on a link to the post within the newsfeed which takes the reader to the publisher’s website. Feedly apparently began hijacking all of the links to the blogger’s content. When readers clicked on the links to articles within their Feedly feeds, they were directed to other links on the Feedly site instead of the links to the site of the publisher who actually created the content. If Feedly readers wanted to e-mail their friends a link to the content, again, the links would direct those friends to Feedly, not to the original publisher’s site. In the comments section to ...Read More »